Celtic had always insisted that it wasn’t responsible because the boys’ club was an “entirely different organisation”.
Lawyers acting for the former players, however, argued that the boys club and Celtic were “intimately connected” and the senior club was “vicariously liable” for assaults carried out.
It’s understood the litigation relates to historical claims of sexual assault Celtic had always insisted that it wasn’t responsible because the boys’ club was an “entirely different organisation”.
Lawyers acting for the former players, however, argued that the boys club and Celtic were “intimately connected” and the senior club was “vicariously liable” for assaults carried out.
It’s understood the litigation relates to historical claims of sexual assault Celtic had always insisted that it wasn’t responsible because the boys’ club was an “entirely different organisation”.
Lawyers acting for the former players, however, argued that the boys club and Celtic were “intimately connected” and the senior club was “vicariously liable” for assaults carried out.
It’s understood the litigation relates to historical claims of sexual assault Celtic had always insisted that it wasn’t responsible because the boys’ club was an “entirely different organisation”.
Lawyers acting for the former players, however, argued that the boys club and Celtic were “intimately connected” and the senior club was “vicariously liable” for assaults carried out.
It’s understood the litigation relates to historical claims of sexual assault Celtic had always insisted that it wasn’t responsible because the boys’ club was an “entirely different organisation”.
Lawyers acting for the former players, however, argued that the boys club and Celtic were “intimately connected” and the senior club was “vicariously liable” for assaults carried out.
It’s understood the litigation relates to historical claims of sexual assault Celtic had always insisted that it wasn’t responsible because the boys’ club was an “entirely different organisation”.
Lawyers acting for the former players, however, argued that the boys club and Celtic were “intimately connected” and the senior club was “vicariously liable” for assaults carried out.
It’s understood the litigation relates to historical claims of sexual assault
